Would you like to make this site your homepage? It's fast and easy...
Yes, Please make this my home page!
The
FIRST Online Indonesian HR Management Resource
.
This page is a mirror of
Big
Dog's Leadership Page under permission from the copyright holder, Donald
R. Clark.
Some links and material are
still left in the original site.
Our high appreciation for the
writer for permitting HR Indonesia to publish
this valueable materials.
|
Big Dog's Leadership Page - Teams (part 2 - Special Project Teams)
by Donald Clark, copyright 1997
Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people
who do the right thing. - Warren Benniss, Ph.D. "On Becoming a Leader"
Introduction
Many organizations have working groups that call themselves teams. A group
that produces work based on a combination of individual contribution is
not a team. Teams produce work that is based on collective effort.
Katzenbach and Smith defined a team as "A small number of people with
complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance
goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable."
The small number is anywhere from 2 to 25 members, with between
5 and 9 as manageable and optimal. Complementary Skills provides
synergy when the team is diverse and various ideas and multiple skills
are combined. Common Purpose is the driving force of teams. The
team must develop its own purpose. This purpose must be meaningful and
must have ownership by everyone, as individuals and as a group. A team
constantly revisit its purpose, making it more relevant as the team develops.
Performance Goals are the acting, moving, and energizing force of
the team. Specific performance goals are established, tracked, met and
evaluated in an ongoing process. Common approach is the way members
agree how they will work together. Many teams have developed their own
charter or a set of rules that outline the expected behaviors of members.
Members often assume roles, including the Questioner, the Historian, the
Time Keeper, the Facilitator, to keep the team process moving and on course.
Mutually accountable is the aspect of teamwork that is usually the
last to develop. It is owning and sharing the team's outcome.
Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, Adjourning
The Tuckman model shows the five stages that teams go through: Form - Storm
- Norm - Perform - Adjourn.
Forming
In the Forming stage, team members are introduced. They state why they
were chosen or volunteered for the team and what they hope to accomplish
within the team. Members cautiously explore the boundaries of acceptable
group behavior. This is a stage of transition from individual to member
status, and of testing the leader's guidance both formally and informally.
Forming includes these feelings and behaviors:
-
Excitement, anticipation, and optimism.
-
Pride in being chosen for the project
-
A tentative attachment to the team
-
Suspicion and anxiety about the job.
-
Defining the tasks and how they will be accomplished.
-
Determining acceptable group behavior.
-
Deciding what information needs to be gathered.
-
Abstract discussions of the concepts and issues, and for some members,
impatience with these discussions. There will be difficulty in identifying
some of the relevant problems.
Because there is so much going on to distract members' attention in the
beginning, the team accomplishes little, if anything, that concerns it's
project goals. This is perfectly normal.
Storming
During the team's transition from the "As-Is" to the "To-Be," is called
the Storming phase. All members have their own ideas as to how the process
should look, and personal agendas are rampant. Storming is probably the
most difficult stage for the team. They begin to realize the tasks that
are ahead are different and more difficult than they imagined. Impatient
about the lack of progress, members argue about just what actions the team
should take. They try to rely solely on their personal and professional
experience, and resist collaborating with most of the other team members.
Storming includes these feelings and behaviors:
-
Resisting the tasks.
-
Resisting quality improvement approaches suggested by other members.
-
Sharp fluctuations in attitude about the team and the project's chance
of success.
-
Arguing among members even when they agree on the real issues.
-
Defensiveness, competition, and choosing sides.
-
Questioning the wisdom of those who selected this project and appointed
the other members of the team.
-
Establishing unrealistic goals.
-
Disunity, increased tension, and jealousy.
The above pressures mean that team members have little energy to spend
on progressing towards the team's goal. But they are beginning to understand
one another. This phase sometimes takes 3 or 4 meetings before arriving
at the Norming phase.
Norming
The Norming phase is when the team reaches a consensus on the "To-Be" process.
Everyone wants to share the newly found focus. Enthusiasm is high, and
the team is tempted to go beyond the original scope of the process. During
this stage, members reconcile competing loyalties and responsibilities.
They accept the team, team ground rules, their roles in the team, and the
individuality of fellow members. Emotional conflict is reduced as previously
competitive relationships become more cooperative.
Norming includes these feelings and behaviors:
-
An ability to express criticism constructively.
-
Acceptance of membership in the team.
-
An attempt to achieve harmony by avoiding conflict.
-
More friendliness, confiding in each other, and sharing of personal problems.
-
A sense of team cohesion, spirit, and goals.
-
Establishing and maintaining team ground rules and boundaries.
As team members begin to work out their differences, they now have more
time and energy to spend on the project.
Performing
The team has now settled its relationships and expectations. They can begin
performing by diagnosing, solving problems, and choosing and implementing
changes. At last team members have discovered and accepted each other's
strengths and weakness, and learned what their roles are. Performing includes
these feelings and behaviors:
-
Members have insights into personal and group processes, and better understanding
of each other's strengths and weakness.
-
Constructive self-change.
-
Ability to prevent or work through group problems
-
Close attachment to the team
The team is now an effective, cohesive unit. You can tell when your team
has reached this stage because you start getting a lot of work done.
Adjourning
The team briefs and shares the improved process during the Adjourning phase.
When the team finally completes that last briefing, there is always a bittersweet
sense of accomplishment coupled with the reluctance to say good-bye. Many
relationships formed within these teams continue long after the team disbands.
Team Verses Group
There are several factors that separate teams from groups.
Roles and Responsibilities
Within a group, individuals establish a set of behaviors called roles.
These roles set expectations governing relationships. Roles often serve
as source of confusion and conflict. While on the other hand, teams have
a shared understanding on how to perform their role. These roles include:
leader, facilitator, timekeeper, and recorder.
Identity
While teams have an identity, groups do not. It is almost impossible to
establish the sense of cohesion that characterizes a team without this
fundamental step. A team has a clear about what constitutes the team's
'work' and why it is important. They can describe a picture of what the
team needs to achieve, and the norms and values that will guide them.
Cohesion
Teams have an esprit that shows a sense of bonding and camaraderie.
Esprit is the spirit, soul, and state of mind of the team. It is the overall
consciousness of the team that a person identifies with and feels a part
of. Individuals begin using "we" more than "me."
Facilitate
Groups have a tendency to get bogged down with trivial issues. Ask yourself,
"How much time gets wasted in meetings you attend?" Teams use facilitators
to keep the team on the right path.
Communication
While members of a group are centered upon themselves, the team is committed
to open communication. Team members feel they can state their opinions,
thoughts, and feelings without fear. Listening is considered as important
speaking. Differences of opinion is valued and methods of managing conflict
are understood. Through honest and caring feedback, members are aware of
their strengths and weakness as team members. There is an atmosphere of
trust and acceptance and a sense of community.
Flexibility
Most groups are extremely rigid. Teams, however maintain a high level of
flexibility, and they perform different task and maintenance functions
as needed. The responsibility for team development and leadership is shared.
The strengths of each member are identified and used.
Morale
Team members are enthusiastic about the work of the team and each person
feels pride in being a member of the team. Team spirit is high. To be a
successful team, the group must have a strong ability to produce results
and a high degree of satisfaction in working with one another.
Team Checklist
-
Goals
-
Clear mission statement
-
Measurable objectives
-
Objectives are prioritized
-
Goals are set in all key task areas
-
Roles
-
Individual roles, relationships, and accountabilities are clear
-
Style of leadership is appropriate for the team tasks
-
Each individual competent to perform her key tasks
-
The mix of roles is appropriate to the team tasks
-
Procedures
-
Decisions reached are effective
-
Management information is effectively shared
-
Key activities are effectively coordinated
-
Products and services are of a high quality
-
Conflict is managed effectively within the team
-
Internal Relationships
-
There are no areas of mistrust
-
Feedback is constructive
-
Relationships are not competitive and unsupportive
-
External Relationships
-
Relationships with key external groups are effective
-
Mechanisms are in place to integrate with each key group
-
Time and effort is spent on identifying building and monitoring key external
relationships
Notes
Created May 11, 1997. Last update - July 5, 1997.
Return to Big Dog's Leadership Page
Donald R. Clark
donclark@nwlink.com